Vol. 27 - Num. 106
Evidence based Pediatrics
M.ª Jesús Esparza Olcinaa, David Pérez Solísb
aPediatra de Atención Primaria. Madrid. España
bServicio de Pediatría. Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes. Gijón. Asturias. España.
Correspondence: MJ Esparza. E-mail: mjesparza8@gmail.com
Reference of this article: Esparza Olcina MJ, Pérez Solís D. Combined or alternating therapy is more effective against fever, but is this the real issue? . Rev Pediatr Aten Primaria. 2025;27:199-202. https://doi.org/10.60147/7903be1c
Published in Internet: 02-06-2025 - Visits: 1228
Abstract
Authors’ conclusions: dual therapy may be superior to single therapy in the treatment of fever in keeping children afebrile at 4 and 6 hours. High-dose ibuprofen was also slightly superior to acetaminophen at 4 hours, but not at 6 hours.
Reviewers’ commentary: alternating and, especially, combination treatment can promote the notion that fever must be suppressed, when the actual goal of treatment should be to manage discomfort. They can also be a source of administration errors. For these reasons, combination or alternating antipyretic treatment, though probably more effective, is unnecessary, as there is no evidence of its clinical usefulness.
Keywords
● Acetaminophen ● Antipyretics ● Fever ● IbuprofenNote:
Este artículo se publica simultáneamente con la revista electrónica Evidencias en Pediatría (www.evidenciasenpediatria.es).